Corvettes for Sale: Three Vettes From the 1960s

5
14736

Corvettes for Sale: Three Vettes From the 1960s border=


Like Tod and Buz of the old “Route 66” TV show, the owner of these three 1960s-era Corvette convertibles has had a good time behind the wheel.

But now he says he’s getting too old to shift the four-speed manual transmissions anymore and is ready – somewhat begrudgingly – to part with all three of them on Craigslist with each car offered for $72,500.

“Have a Lotta good times in them,” he says of the ’61, ’63, and ’66 Corvettes.

It hurts to sell them, he adds, but life is too short. “I love the cars but life more important.”

1963 Corvevtte Convertible


We’re not told much else about the condition of the cars, but a series of photos do offer up some tips for the discerning buyer.

The red-on-red ’61, shown inside a trailer, includes a removable hardtop and at least appearance-wise looks nice.

1966 Corvevtte Convertible


The light blue ’63 is only shown from a distance sitting in a driveway, and we don’t know how old the photos are. Still, it looks good.

We see the silver ’66 inside a garage, with its black soft top and excellent black interior on display.

The photos don’t show all the details, so a buyer would be wise to see them in person to make an accurate judgment.

Update
Boy, did we get this one wrong. The original title said all three cars were selling for $72,500 when instead, each is selling for that amount. We have corrected the headline and article to reflect that. Sorry for the confusion and thanks to Matt for setting us straight.


Source:
Craigslist.com via BarnFinds.com

Related:
Corvettes for Sale: A Rare Pratt & Miller 2007 Corvette C6RS Offered on BaT
Corvettes for Sale: 1967 Corvette Restomod With an LS2 and Five-Speed Manual
Corvettes for Sale: 1963 Corvette Split Window Stored for 20 Years on eBay

 



-

5 COMMENTS

  1. Seems too good to be true, and I actually think $72,500 is the price he is asking for each of the cars, not for all 3, as his ad says “Your choice 72,500for For each of them . . .”.

Comments are closed.