<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Depreciating Corvettes: The Top 10 of 2005</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.corvetteblogger.com/2006/03/02/Depreciating-Corvettes-The-Top-10-of-2005/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.corvetteblogger.com/2006/03/02/Depreciating-Corvettes-The-Top-10-of-2005/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 20:59:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>http://www.corvetteblogger.com/2006/03/02/Depreciating-Corvettes-The-Top-10-of-2005/comment-page-1/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">Depreciating-Corvettes-The-Top-10-of-2005#comment-222</guid>
		<description>Just bought one with low mileage, all the opts and the LT4 one year only engine.   Buy low, sell high?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just bought one with low mileage, all the opts and the LT4 one year only engine.   Buy low, sell high?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.corvetteblogger.com/2006/03/02/Depreciating-Corvettes-The-Top-10-of-2005/comment-page-1/#comment-514</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">Depreciating-Corvettes-The-Top-10-of-2005#comment-514</guid>
		<description>The collector&#039;s edition (96) is a bit of a surprise that it is a big depreciator.  Perhaps the value of C5s is now so great that even the collectable c4&#039;s have lost their charm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The collector&#8217;s edition (96) is a bit of a surprise that it is a big depreciator.  Perhaps the value of C5s is now so great that even the collectable c4&#8217;s have lost their charm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
